OKLAHOMA CITY (AP) 鈥 A divided Oklahoma Supreme Court on Tuesday overturned a portion of the state鈥檚 near total ban on abortion, ruling women have a right to abortion when pregnancy risks their health, not just in a medical emergency.
It was a narrow win for abortion rights advocates since the U.S. Supreme Court last year. Since then, conservative states including Oklahoma have enforced restrictions on abortion.
Oklahoma's top court ruled that a woman has the right under the state Constitution to receive an abortion to preserve her life if her doctor determines that continuing the pregnancy would endanger it due to a condition she has or is likely to develop during the pregnancy. Previously, the right to an abortion could only take place in the case of medical emergency.
鈥淩equiring one to wait until there is a medical emergency would further endanger the life of the pregnant woman and does not serve a compelling state interest,鈥 the ruling states.
In the 5-4 ruling, the court said the state law uses both the words 鈥減reserve鈥 and 鈥渟ave鈥 the mother鈥檚 life as an exception to the abortion ban.
鈥淭he language 鈥榚xcept to save the life of a pregnant woman in a medical emergency鈥 is much different from 鈥榩reserve her life,鈥欌 according to the ruling.
鈥淎bsolute certainty," by the physician that the mother's life could be endangered, "is not required, however, mere possibility or speculation is insufficient鈥 to determine that an abortion is needed to preserve the woman鈥檚 life, according to the ruling.
The court, however, declined to rule on whether the state Constitution grants the right to an abortion for other reasons.
The court ruled in the lawsuit filed by Planned Parenthood, Tulsa Women's Reproductive Clinic and others challenging the state laws passed after the U.S. Supreme Court overturned the Roe v. Wade, which had guaranteed a nationwide right to abortion for nearly half a century.
Since then, a patchwork of laws has meant some patients have had to travel to other states to get abortions when it was outlawed where they lived.
鈥淭his ruling leaves out too many Oklahomans. Oklahomans shouldn鈥檛 have to travel across state lines just to reach an abortion clinic, and it is heartbreaking that many will not be able to do so,鈥 said Dr. Alan Braid, an abortion provider and plaintiff in the case said in a statement.
The ruling in Oklahoma is unlikely to mean abortion becomes widely available.
In a over Texas鈥 abortion ban, five women said they were denied abortions even when pregnancy endangered their lives. The suit claims the Texas law is creating confusion among doctors, who are turning away some pregnant women experiencing health complications because they fear repercussions.
Emily Wales, president and CEO of Planned Parenthood of Great Plains called the ruling a small step toward restoring the right to abortion.
鈥淭he Oklahoma Supreme Court recognized one fundamental truth: patients must be permitted to access critical care to save their lives,鈥 she said. 鈥淏ut the right recognized today is so limited that most people who need abortion will not be able to access it.鈥
___
Follow AP鈥檚 full coverage of abortion:
