UK court rules that extension of UK police powers to intervene in protests is unlawful

FILE- An activist from the group Just Stop Oil is arrested by police officers as they slow the traffic, marching on a road, in London, on Oct. 30, 2023. Britain's High Court ruled Tuesday, May 21, 2024, that new regulations that gave U.K. police more powers to intervene in protests were unlawful. Campaign group Liberty brought legal action against the British government over a law passed last year that lowered the threshold for what is considered 鈥渟erious disruption鈥 to community life caused by a protest. (AP Photo/Kin Cheung, File)

LONDON (AP) 鈥 Britain's High Court ruled Tuesday that new regulations that gave U.K. police more powers to intervene in protests are unlawful.

Civil liberties campaign group Liberty brought legal action against the British government over a law passed last year that lowered the threshold for what is considered 鈥渟erious disruption鈥 to community life caused by a protest.

The 2023 Public Order Act broadened the definition of 鈥渟erious disruption鈥 from 鈥渟ignificant鈥 and 鈥減rolonged鈥 disturbance to individuals or an organization to 鈥渕ore than minor."

Authorities introduced the changes by a process called statutory instrument, which faces less scrutiny, after Parliament rejected them earlier. The measures targeted who have staged disruptive protests in recent years on busy highways and roads in the U.K. and beyond to raise awareness about the urgency of climate change.

Suella Braverman, the home secretary at the time, told lawmakers last year that the measures would allow ordinary people to drive or get to work on time free from obstruction from a 鈥渟elfish minority.鈥

Critics say the change was part of a worrying in Britain.

Two judges ruled Tuesday that the Home Office acted outside of its powers and failed to carry out a fair consultation process.

Judges Nicholas Green and Timothy Kerr said 鈥溾榮erious鈥 cannot, in the enabling legislation, mean 鈥榤ore than minor.鈥欌

Akiko Hart, Liberty鈥檚 director, said the ruling was a 鈥渉uge victory for democracy."

鈥淭hese dangerous powers were rejected by Parliament yet still sneaked through the back door with the clear intention of stopping protesters that the government did not personally agree with," Hart said.

The government said it was disappointed with the ruling.

鈥淲e鈥檝e said before that the right to protest is fundamental to democracy, but we simply will not tolerate intimidation or serious disruption of the law-abiding majority.," said Prime Minister Rishi Sunak鈥檚 spokesman, Dave Pares.

鈥淲e will consider all options to keep this important power for police, including appealing the judgment if necessary."

The 好色tv Press. All rights reserved.